Thursday 16 May 2013

Excised!?!

I had planned a different post until today Australia excised itself from it's own migration zone...

I had planned to write about how the federal budget, handed down on Tuesday, had stolen $375 Million dollars of foreign aid to fund locking up refugees closer to home. Turns out this budgetary sleight-of-hand could be worse than just misdirection with funding spent on prevention programs closer to home.  

I had planned to write about these issues because I felt they reflected poorly on Australia's national character. Perhaps more importantly, I wanted to write because I believed this was not who we are.   


I’m struggling to process the enormity of this move by both the government and opposition. More than anything I feel it’s a stain on Australia’s national character that one of the few bipartisan moves our politicians can muster is to systemically deny desperate people protection.

Australia sells itself on many ideals, one of which is an egalitarian spirit. We call it a 'fair go'. We evoke it everywhere from the sporting field to the national debate on welfare funding. It's about what people deserve by virtue of their being human.

Today we eroded that for some trumped notion of 'border security'. As parts of the world suffer through real strife, we have invented calamities that don't exist. Any threat to Australia comes, not at the hands of those seeking asylum, but from our own small-minded, isolationist view on the world.

It’s telling that the Green’s amendments designed to ensure transparency were voted down. Aware of our culpability in making this move we prefer collective denial. 

This can not stand for long. 

Only five years ago we apologised as a nation to the stolen generation. A generation of children and families that were wronged because of bigoted policies and a misguided notion of right. We stand again at the precipice between compassion and bigotry and once again have chosen the wrong path. 

Who then will bear the burden of this mistake? Who will voice a national apology to Ranjini & Paari, and so many other children who will suffer as a result of this policy? 

The shame of this move has been buried beneath the perceived ‘national will’ that drives it. If Australian’s en masse do not cry out against this move then perhaps we are guilty as much as our leaders. We are the first country in the world to take such a move, Amnesty International has condemned it. We are taking a lead that should not be followed.

National security means nothing if we give up all that is worth protecting..

Tuesday 14 May 2013

Decrypting the NBN


Once again please let me share a little bit of my writing from beyond the 'blogger'-sphere. This is my second piece to grace the (web)pages of FBi 94.5 Sydney Radio.


My posts have adopted a moniker: 'Pub Politics' (ta-da!) The idea being that we are taking the some of the major topics in Australia today and trying to deconstruct them in the same way you might over a drink or two at the pub.

Hopefully we have something to say. At worst I hope a few people feel more engaged in topics they otherwise might not have approached before.

As always I have retained my original text for this post, but if you'd like to check out the published version...

Decrypting the NBN...


You're reading a blog, good for you! I'm guessing that means you're into this whole internet thing that's been going on. It's okay I guess, what with the music, Facebook, the widespread intelligent discussion of Game of Thrones...


There, there Malcolm...
But will you be voting this September on the National Broadband Network? Well probably not if the poll is held online as traffic slows our upload speeds to a crawl and the election drags into early 2014.

Nothing about the NBN conversation is running smoothly at the moment as Stephen Conroy found while frantically clicking 'refresh' on his browser at the Sydney media launch on Sunday. So I thought I might have a look at some of the issues slowing the data down.

Infrastructure


As both parties attempt to score points for their NBN plans most Australians just want to know how much, how fast and when they'll get faster Youtube clips.

But that's not the point of the NBN and you might just scare Tony back into his old anti-NBN thinking talking like that. Because the National Broadband Network is an infrastructure project designed to


There's already 54,000 people in Australia today using the NBN. Unconfirmed reports suggest that it's so fast they're already downloading Season 4 of 'Game of Thrones'.

Faster's Better Right?


It seems like everyone's promising something faster when it comes to the NBN. Perhaps the first and most important thing to note is that any NBN represents an improvement on the current situation. Gizmodo Australia reported in 2011 average download speeds of 348 KBps. When the NBN finally rolls out we are being promised speeds between 25MBps up to 1GBps (fast!)

Why wait for breaking news from Westeros!
Labor has said that they will deliver faster download speeds by way of fiber optic cables right through your letterbox and up through your toilet. The Liberals however have said it might save a few bucks if they just go fiber to the nearest public convenience and then a copper carrier pigeon lugs the data the rest of the way.

To illustrate "the large performance differential of the Labor and Coalition NBNs", James Brotchie built a website called How Fast is the NBN? Brotchie's point is illustrative if not precise and highlights the need for more transparency and details from both parties. It portrays a far swifter Labor NBN for both upload and download speeds.

But the Coalition promise they can deliver the whole system faster. Two years faster! That's shorter than most teenage engagements...

Money Matters


Getting the NBN we want is not going to be cheap though. Sure you can score some free wifi here and there these days but whichever plan you prefer is going to cost Australians billions of dollars.

The policy being spruiked by the coalition also promises to be cheaper. They are emphasizing fiscal responsibility by suggesting that we aim to create only speeds that will be utilised at the moment (ie: slower). Whether this leaves us short in the future is yet to be seen. Certainly we can expect more users pays, especially if you want fiber right up your home.

Huh, Uploads?


One thing we're not hearing a lot about in all the NBN discussion is what the upload speeds will be like. Uploads become really important when you start doing stuff, instead of just watching stuff. From what I could find upload speeds are going to be adjustable on a user pays basis; faster than today but it'll cost you.

Innovation and Future-Proofing


FBi without an NBN?!
Nobodies died of slow internet speeds yet (apologies Call of Duty fans, I see you waving). As we become increasingly inured to our online existence, our work and productivity will likewise be increasingly tied to competitive broadband speeds. Here at FBi we wouldn't last too long if we relied on you all listening us on crystal radios. 

The proof of the NBN pudding will be in how it tastes. Many critics suggest we already have plenty of capacity for email, Facebook, Youtube… all the stuff we’re doing now. This attitude severely curtails innovation and future growth; the point of any infrastructure development.

On the horizon E-health and education are just two sectors touted as potentially huge growth areas as we have access to faster broadband. The point is that we are not operating in a worldwide vacuum. As other countries develop their infrastructure, Australia risks being left behind. 

Probably the most important function of the NBN is the one that hasn't been thought up yet. That toddler in front of you on the bus glued to her mum's tablet? She could be the innovator that's takes our online lives to the next level.

If she has the infrastructure to support it...

Wednesday 8 May 2013

Commit to Community Radio



Today I'd like to share my first foray into more professional writing. Below is my first article published for FBi 94.5FM, a Sydney youth radio network.

The article below draws on several of my drafts and reflects my own editing but none of my editor at FBi. Basically for the 'Rightz' blog I wanted to preserve my own voice not someone else's, even if it is superior.

The processing of drafting and editing for a professional publication was a huge learning curve for me and one I think I'm going to enjoy. Writing has always been a personal endeavour and now I've found a much more social, interactive process I think I can only improve.

You can check out the final article on FBi's website. Hope you enjoy and thanks for reading!    

________________


Does Government Funding Reflect Those Figures?

Wally supports Community Radio... Do You?

Let’s ask Gotye…




“You didn’t have to cut me off!”

See, there’s a lack of funding for digital community radio services.

Wally de Backer (aka – Gotye) recently wrote an open letter to the Communications Minister Stephen Conroy asking him to address the shortfall for the future of community radio. The Minister’s response however suggested that stations should just fund themselves.

Wally’s kinda famous for writing catchy, award winning tunes. But he acknowledges that even with all his talent, community radio helped him kick it all off.

Oh, here let him tell it:

“Australian community radio has been instrumental in my recent international success. Without the support and encouragement of community stations when I started self releasing my music in 2001 I would not have been able to develop my career.” 

Now digital community radio is fighting for its life with only one week before the federal budget and a $1.4 Million dollar shortfall to continue services.

The long and the shortfall…

Back in 2009 the federal government provided $11.2 Million dollars to kickstart community digital radio across Australia. The funding was instituted by Senator Stephen Conroy, Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy. 

Money was for the setup and operation of digital radio services over three years and was part of the government’s commitment to a digital future for radio.

Basic annual costs for digital radio have leveled at $3.6 Million dollars a year. In May 2012 the government announced funding of $2.2 Million dollars a year over four years for digital community radio.

… Hang on a minute, that’s short $1.4 Million dollars.


A cut, or a shortfall?

Any way you cut it (pun intended) the government’s ongoing funding commitment of $2.2 million dollars a year is $1.4 million dollars short of the operational costs of community digital radio.

The government maintains it hasn’t cut anything; it’s giving money away! This ignores the basic costs projected to access the digital radio platform. Failure is built into the system.

Heard about media diversity?

The government bangs on about it a fair bit. Basically it’s about having lots of voices expressing different opinions.

And how does digital community radio help support media diversity?

It’s all in the name; community radio supports and represents exactly what it says – communities. Whether it’s Indigenous voices on Koori Radio 93.7 FM, Muslim voices on Muslim Community Radio 92.1 FM, or yours truly here at FBi 94.5 FM supporting your voice!

The digital component is important because we are all consuming media in different ways.

Infrastructure is for the future stupid!

One of the problems with the governments argument is that ignores the future potential of digital radio. As we change and evolve the way we consume media maintaining and developing a digital option becomes increasingly important.

This is basically the argument the government made in criticizing the Oppositions NBN policy. Remember Conroy is also Minister for the Digital Economy. But can he see the inconsistency?

No!

So what can we do?    

If you haven’t already, go to http://committocommunityradio.org.au/ and join the campaign for digital radio funding.

You can also send Senator Conroy an email, hell give him a call on (02) 6277 7480. Tell him what FBi and digital community radio means to you!

Thursday 2 May 2013

Concerning the tragedy in Bangladesh


What questions do you ask before you open your wallet?

The most challenging response I have read to the tragedy in Bangladesh, written by Michele O'Neil, entitled 'Is there blood on your t-shirt?' It asks why...

"...do we accept in 2013 that for the sake of fashion or a bargain 
we turn a blind eye to the truth of the labour behind the label?" 

The human cost of the tragedy is evident in the images and testimony from Dhaka. Yet this will fade, just as all the tragedy that turns the 24-hour news cycle fades, unless we acknowledge that we are complicit in the events unfolding.

Forget democratic notions of one vote, one voice. Too many people feel disenfranchised and powerless to act when they believe that chance occurs only once every three years. Your vote, your opinion, on so many issues affecting our world, is cast every day when you open your wallet and pay for goods and services.

Marketing Corporate Responsibility...

I chose to petition K-mart after I heard of the factory collapse in Dhaka. Not because they're the worst; I hadn't even heard their name associated with the factory that collapsed. I chose K-mart because I knew I had t-shirts in a drawer that I had bought from K-mart with 'Made in Bangladesh' on the label. My purchase had made me complicit in their actions.

K-mart's website is all red, white and blue and happy, smiling faces. I doubt it's meant to be patriotic, just presenting a consistent, positive brand. Moving beyond the shopping aspect of the site (they are a retailer after all) K-mart presents an image of active, civic minded, corporate responsibility.

Corporate responsibility is probably the first thing to get our heads around. Companies like K-mart are legal entities which these days gives them many of the rights and responsibilities of people. Generally it seems they take these rights and responsibilities seriously. This is because it allows them to make a stack of money, but also because they can be held responsible if someone is hurt or injured.

Amongst K-mart's good deeds is a partnership with the 'Half the Sky' foundation. They do fantastic work supporting women's rights and I've written about them before.

K-mart also provides the outline of their 'Ethical Sourcing Code' on their website. This code is frequently referred to in discussing their business practices. It outlines standards for employment, fairness, health and safety, generally as thorough a range of protections that you could hope for. K-mart also refers to compliance with local laws and standards as well as auditing.

I believe K-mart and the sincerity of the declarations made on their website. I believe them not because I think they are all fundamentally wonderful human beings, but because they have a smiling, happy brand to protect. Without checking every website of every brand in my wardrobe I would guess they all have similar ethical standards for sourcing garments. Dead workers is just bad marketing.

And yet tragedies like Dhaka still occur.

Do I Just go Naked?

If I believe the intentions but also acknowledge the reality how can I ever go shopping again?

I've heard op-shopping suggested as an alternative. While better than joining a nudist colony I find many hipster shirts just don't fit my broad shoulders. Increasingly they are also recent cast offs from the stores we're still interrogating.

Honestly I'm not sure about the answer here.

What I do know is that more than any government or international police agency, massive corporations like Wesfarmers (the parent company of K-mart) have the ability to go into a country and exert influence on the ground. They have this power because they have money to invest.

Corporations choose countries like Bangladesh because the relatively low labour costs keep their overheads down. Even without touching labour costs a corporation like Wesfarmers can improve conditions by demanding contractors and factory owners sign up to documents like the 'Bangladesh Fire and Building Safety Agreement'. Standards like this might help prevent another building collapse.

Corporations aren't just going to do this on their own though. Remember, their marketing campaign already has us thinking they're great. As consumers we have to demand these extra steps be taken. If they don't we take our dollars somewhere they will.

Once they've done it make them tell us too. I can find coffee easily enough that will sell me on it's human rights credentials. Why not clothing?

I'm not sure how this could be implemented, but with many consumers making decisions in the store we need more transparency and information available. All our purchases are suspect as long as we continue to make them in ignorance.

Remember every one of those purchases is a vote you can cast about the world you want to live in.    

_________________

Here's the letter I wrote to K-mart:

"To whom it may concern,

I'm writing today to enquire about K-mart's sourcing and production of garments.

In the aftermath of the tragic factory collapse in Bangladesh I investigated and found that several t-shirts I had purchased at K-mart outlets were 'Made in Bangladesh'. 

I feel terrible that it has taken an incident of this magnitude to make me more aware of the conditions under which my clothes are made. Today I would like to ask you some questions that will shape my future opinions and shopping habits at K-mart.  

In researching these issues I found many encouraging things about K-mart's corporate civic standards. 

I note that K-mart is an 'official partner' of the Half the Sky foundation. The work of Half the Sky offers fantastic opportunities for women in developing countries and I applaud your support for such a worthy organisation.

In my research I also discovered information about K-mart's 'Ethical Sourcing Code'. My reading of this code suggests that K-mart applies high standards throughout the supply chain. 

One criticism I have heard leveled against garment retailers is that the supply chain is being increasingly outsourced. The rationale seems to be that 'subcontractors' and in-country manufacturers then bear the brunt of responsibility and blame when abuses and accidents occur.

I have also heard numerous criticisms about the lack of transparency of many Australian fashion retailers. At present I have been unable to discover any public comments by K-mart about any manufacturing in Bangladesh.

Your ethical sourcing code makes reference to independent auditing and compliance with local codes (building etc.) Yet it does not seem at all clear to me that this process is not open to the corruption that is an open secret in countries such as Bangladesh.

The thoughts I have offered you today came after a significant amount of research. Many consumers do not have the time or inclination to do this. For some that means continuing to shop at K-mart regardless of your supply-chain practices. For others it will mean dropping your brand for other more transparent brands.

I would like to challenge you today on two points:
- Will you endeavor to make sourcing information on ethical fashion shopping easier? Just as we now have information about our food (eggs, coffee, chocolate etc.) so to should we have easy access to information on our clothing.
- Secondly will K-mart (and your parent company Wesfarmers) sign on to the Bangladesh Fire and Building Safety Agreement? Though you may not have been part of the problem in the building collapse in Dhaka, you have a unique opportunity to lead the way in being part of the solution.

Corporate entities such as Wesfarmers are able to exert influence across borders in a way politicians and individuals cannot. Globalism doesn't have to be a dirty word. Please use your influence to change the situation of workers on whom your brand success is founded.

Sincerely
Andrew Pople"