What are you reading
this on?
There are more than a
billion people on Facebook. I read that on my tablet the other day. I was
flicking through some blogs and posts on Flipboard and there it was in the
middle of an article about online trends.
Psy’s hit a billion
too on Youtube I gather, while Obama won his first presidential election on
social media and the Arab Spring owes some of it’s success to Twitter. The fact
that everything from Facebook to Twitter allows you to check-in now makes me
think that most of these people are watching, talking and organising from
mobile devices. Huge numbers of people doing amazing things from their pockets
and backpacks.
I tend to write this
blog on my laptop but I don’t mind drafting on my phone; so far I lack the
patience to type long paragraphs on such a small keyboard. I worry though that
people are tuning out after the first 140 characters. Which brings me back to
my original question of what are you reading this on, or perhaps more important
to think about is whether would you be reading, writing and responding to any
of this new media if it weren’t for your device. I don’t think it’s an
impossible scenario that in the future the western world will consider access to an
online device as a basic right; denial being akin to denying someone their
right to speak freely.
We like to think of
the online world and social media as being an egalitarian playground where
participation has more to do with your cachet in wit and wisdom than your
bankroll or influence. This forgets however one very important, very expensive
initial entry criteria… our devices.
When I think about the
potential for social media to connect, rally and influence I cannot help but
wonder what we are missing out on from those who just don’t have access. How
would Instagramming our amazing meal photos be understood if people starving in
refugee camps could reply with images of their meagre repast? If social media
tools like FB and Twitter could play such a powerful role in the Middle East
and America, what role might they play in other regions of political or social
unrest less able to get online and organise.
Free speech is an
ideal much touted but even in places where people can express themselves freely
they are not always guaranteed an audience. The mobile-online world allows live
content development and publishing as well as access to a huge audience always
on the lookout for new things. Think about a cause or charity you believe,
maybe donate to. Their webpage probably has a ‘like’ symbol as well as a little
blue/white bird and an orange RSS logo all ready for you to click on. They are
networked and ready to harness the huge numbers available online to their
cause; making a difference through people. If you cannot afford to get on
social media though you are essentially stuck in the nineteenth century,
waiting for some benevolent colonial to notice and take pity on your plight.
Mobile connectivity
has provided so much to the world, shallow as it may seem at times. It is
important to remember though that this opportunity is not completely
democratic, not free for all. Consider this next time you peruse the voices on
Twitter and the channels on Youtube; listen critically to who is talking but
question also whose voices are missing. Remember this also when you tweet your own
voice what an amazing privilege it is just to have the chance to be heard.
No comments:
Post a Comment